Make vs n8n — a side-by-side look at two leading tools, scored and reviewed by DigiJaws. Pricing verified June 2026 and re-checked weekly.
Quick verdict
- Choose Make if you want: The most powerful visual workflow editor at a fair price. Best for Power users and agencies.
- Choose n8n if you want: Own your automation — free self-hosting plus the most complete visual AI-agent stack. Best for Technical founders and AI builders.
Side-by-side comparison
| Make | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Best for | The most powerful visual workflow editor at a fair price. | Own your automation — free self-hosting plus the most complete visual AI-agent stack. |
| Pricing model | credit-based subscription (per module action) | per-execution cloud OR free self-host |
| Free tier | yes (1,000 ops/mo) | yes (self-hosted Community Edition, unlimited) |
| Entry price | Core $9/mo | Cloud Starter ~EUR24/mo |
| Ideal team | SMBs & agencies | Technical teams with an engineer |
| Learning curve | Medium-High | High |
| Full review | Make review | n8n review |
The bottom line
Make (4.5/5) is the pick when the most powerful visual workflow editor at a fair price. matters most; n8n (4.5/5) wins when own your automation — free self-hosting plus the most complete visual ai-agent stack. is your priority. Watch-outs: Make — Credits burn on timers and failures — plan capacity carefully. n8n — You need at least one technical person; self-host maintenance time can exceed the hosting fee. Compare the whole field in our tools guide or the Tool Finder.