Make — Visual, credit-based automation (formerly Integromat) with the best workflow canvas and powerful branching logic.
Verdict at a glance
Overall rating: 4.5/5 ★★★★½
Standout: The most powerful visual workflow editor at a fair price.
Watch out: Credits burn on timers and failures — plan capacity carefully.
The best overall balance of power, price, and visual UX in 2026. Accept the learning curve and watch credit burn, and Make outperforms Zapier on most involved workflows.
Quick facts
- Ideal team: SMBs & agencies
- Learning curve: Medium-High
- Setup time: Hours
- Support: Email, docs, community
- Key limit: Operation/credit limits; polling & failed ops consume credits
- Top integrations: 3,000+ apps, HTTP/API, Webhooks
Real-world ratings (third-party)
The rating above is DigiJaws’s own editorial verdict. Here’s how it scores on independent review platforms, pulled directly from each platform as of 2026-08-06:
| Platform | Rating | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.6/5 | 334 |
| Capterra | 4.8/5 | 407 |
Ratings and review counts change as new reviews come in — check the linked platform for the live number. We don’t (yet) run our own on-site review collection, so we cite third-party aggregators for independent signal.
Overview
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform built around a drag-and-drop scenario canvas where data flow is always visible. It connects 3,000+ apps and tends to expose more triggers, actions, and data fields per app than Zapier.
Make excels at complex, multi-branch workflows using routers, iterators, aggregators, and error handlers, with unlimited modules and routes per scenario. It is widely rated the best-value automation platform for involved workflows — the trade-off is a steeper learning curve and a credit model that can be unpredictable.
Watch it in action
Make’s own demo of an AI Agent automating inventory updates from Slack, part of its next-generation AI Agents library.
“How to Automate Inventory Updates from Slack with a Make AI Agent” — official video.
Key features
- Visual scenario builder (best-in-class)
- Routers, filters, iterators, aggregators
- Error handlers; unlimited modules & routes per scenario
- 3,000+ apps with deep per-app actions
- AI modules & agent orchestration
- HTTP/API modules and webhooks
Pricing (as of 2026-09-10)
Model: credit-based subscription (per module action) · Free tier: yes (1,000 ops/mo) · Entry paid: Core $12/mo for 10k credits/mo
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | ★ 1,000 credits/mo · no-code visual builder · 3,000+ apps · routers and filters · 15-minute minimum interval |
| Core | $12/mo (10k credits/mo) | Unlimited active scenarios · scheduling down to the minute · higher data transfer limits · Make API access |
| Pro | $21/mo (10k credits/mo) | Priority scenario execution · custom variables · full-text execution log search |
| Teams | $38/mo (10k credits/mo) | Teams and team roles · shared scenario templates |
| Enterprise | Custom | Security, governance, on-prem agents, 24/7 support |
Most actions = 1 credit; some AI actions cost more. Polling/schedules consume credits on a timer, and failed operations are also billed.
⚠️ Credit consumption can be hard to predict on complex or AI-heavy scenarios. Pricing changes often — confirm on the vendor site.
Ratings breakdown
- Ease Of Use: 3.5/5
- Features: 4.5/5
- Value: 5.0/5
- Support: 4.0/5
Pros
- Best visual workflow editor with excellent debugging
- Powerful branching logic (routers/iterators/aggregators)
- Excellent price/performance vs Zapier
- Deeper per-app actions and data fields
Cons
- Real learning curve (~2-3 hrs; JSON/webhook concepts)
- Credit consumption is unpredictable (polling + failed ops billed)
- Fewer total integrations than Zapier
Who it’s for
- Power users and agencies
- SMBs/SaaS and ops teams needing complex multi-step automations without code
Who it’s not for
- Those wanting the simplest possible setup (Zapier)
- Teams needing full code control/self-hosting (n8n)
- Autonomous decision-making agents (Lindy/Relevance)
Best use cases
- Data orchestration
- AI agent pipelines
- Complex multi-branch operations automation
Integrations
3,000+ apps, HTTP/API modules, webhooks.
Alternatives
Zapier, n8n, Tray.io.
Recent changes
Make has changed the unit it bills. As verified on 2026-09-10, plans are priced in credits rather than operations: Free covers 1,000 credits a month, Core is $12 for 10,000, Pro $21 and Teams $38 at the same volume. The $9 Core price this review was written against reflected the old operations model. A credit is one module action, so the practical cost of a given scenario depends on how many steps it runs, not how often it fires.
Frequently asked questions
Does Make have a free plan?
Yes — the Free plan covers up to 1,000 operations per month with basic functionality; the entry paid plan is Core at $12/mo, which raises the limit to 10,000 credits and unlocks full core features.
Why can Make’s credit consumption be hard to predict?
Most actions cost 1 operation, but scheduled polling and failed operations also consume credits even when they don’t produce a useful result, so scenarios with frequent timers or unreliable third-party APIs can burn through a plan’s allowance faster than the raw task count would suggest.
Is Make better than Zapier?
Make generally offers a more powerful visual canvas with deeper branching logic (routers, iterators, aggregators) and better price-to-power ratio for complex workflows, while Zapier has more total integrations and a gentler learning curve for simple, linear automations — see our Zapier review for the comparison.
What is Make’s rating on G2 and Capterra?
As of 2026-08-06, Make holds 4.6/5 on G2 (334 reviews, listed as “Make (formerly Integromat)”) and 4.8/5 on Capterra (407 reviews, listed under its former name Integromat). See the ratings table above for links to the live pages.
Similar tools in Automation & Workflows
Sources
- https://www.make.com/en/pricing
- https://www.lindy.ai/blog/make-review
- https://bestautomationtools.ai/reviews/make-review/
Compiled from public sources; last verified 2026-09-10. Pricing is subject to change — verify with the vendor. Ratings reflect editorial opinion.
Looking for the numbers? Our Make pricing page breaks down every plan, what each upgrade costs over a year, and what the headline price leaves out.
Head-to-head: Make vs n8n · Zapier vs Make vs n8n
Make Review (4.5/5): Features & Verdict (2026). DigiJaws, 2026. https://digijaws.com/reviews/make/