Gumloop — An AI-native, no-code automation platform built around a visual node editor where any step can be an AI model call.
Verdict at a glance
Overall rating: 4/5 ★★★★☆
Standout: AI-native by design — every node can be an AI step and any flow can be wrapped as an autonomous agent, with model-agnostic choice of GPT, Claude, or Gemini.
Watch out: Credit-based pricing where advanced AI calls cost far more than simple steps, and published pricing tiers vary widely by source.
A strong choice for teams that want AI baked into automation rather than bolted on, especially for document processing and unstructured-data tasks. Just budget carefully — advanced AI nodes burn credits quickly.
Real-world ratings (third-party)
The rating above is DigiJaws’s own editorial verdict. Here’s how it scores on independent review platforms, pulled directly from the platform as of 2026-08-06:
Capterra’s listing for Gumloop is based on a very small sample (2 reviews) — treat it as a weak signal. The G2 sample is very small (7 reviews) — treat it as an early, lighter signal. Ratings and review counts change as new reviews come in — check the linked platform for the live number. We don’t (yet) run our own on-site review collection, so we cite third-party aggregators for independent signal.
Overview
Gumloop is a no-code automation platform that lets you build AI-powered workflows with a drag-and-drop, node-based canvas. It connects your tools, automates repetitive tasks, and puts AI models directly inside the pipeline for jobs like data extraction, lead generation, web scraping, and content creation. Its differentiator is an AI-native architecture: every node in the library can be replaced with an AI step, every flow can be wrapped as an autonomous agent, and the design is model-agnostic so you pick which LLM runs each decision.
A Y Combinator W24 company, Gumloop raised a $50M Series B led by Benchmark in March 2026, signaling strong momentum. The main trade-offs are a credit-based cost model where advanced AI calls are far more expensive than standard steps, and a smaller native integration catalog than incumbents like Zapier — though it covers the most common business apps.
Watch it in action
Gumloop’s own getting-started walkthrough of building flows with nodes and AI steps.
“Getting started with Gumloop: Flows, nodes & AI” — official video.
Key features
- Visual, node-based no-code workflow builder
- AI-native nodes (any step can call an AI model)
- Model-agnostic: GPT, Claude, and Gemini
- Flows wrappable as autonomous agents
- Web scraping & unstructured-data extraction
- Document processing and content generation
- Scheduling and conditional triggers
Pricing (as of 2026-06-29)
Model: credit-based subscription · Free tier: yes (credit allowance varies by source) · Entry paid: from ~$37/mo
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Monthly credit allowance (sources cite ~500–5,000), full builder access |
| Starter / Solo | from ~$37/mo | Higher credit allowance, unlimited workflows |
| Pro / Team | ~$97–$197/mo | More credits, team features, collaboration |
| Enterprise | custom | High volume, security, support |
Gumloop bills in credits: every workflow has a base cost of 1 credit plus per-node costs. Simple actions cost 1–3 credits, standard AI models ~2 credits per call, advanced models ~20, and expert models 30+ — so AI-heavy flows scale costs fast. Published plan names and prices differ significantly across third-party sources.
⚠️ Pricing is subject to change and sources conflict on exact tiers and credit allowances — verify current plans on gumloop.com before relying on these figures.
Ratings breakdown
- Ease Of Use: 4.0/5
- Features: 4.3/5
- Value: 3.7/5
- Support: 3.8/5
Pros
- Truly AI-native architecture, not AI bolted onto rules
- Model-agnostic choice of GPT, Claude, or Gemini
- Strong at document processing and unstructured-data extraction
- Visual node editor is approachable for non-developers
- Well-funded with clear momentum (YC W24; $50M Series B)
Cons
- Advanced AI nodes consume credits quickly
- Pricing tiers are confusing and inconsistent across sources
- Smaller native integration catalog than Zapier/Make
- Less suited to simple trigger-action automations
Who it’s for
- Teams wanting AI at the center of their workflows
- Marketing, ops, and data teams doing extraction or enrichment
- Builders who want autonomous agents from visual flows
Who it’s not for
- Users needing the widest possible app coverage (use Zapier)
- Teams wanting flat, predictable per-task pricing
- Simple notify/sync automations with no AI
Best use cases
- Document processing and data extraction
- Lead generation and enrichment
- Web scraping pipelines
- AI content generation workflows
Integrations
120+ integrations including Slack, Gmail, HubSpot, Airtable, Notion, Google Sheets, Salesforce, Stripe, GitHub, and Linear, plus direct access to GPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Alternatives
Lindy, Relevance AI, n8n, Make, Zapier.
Recent changes
Raised a $50M Series B led by Benchmark in March 2026 and continued expanding its AI-native node library and agent capabilities. Plan structure (Free, Solo/Starter, Pro/Team) has shifted over time and varies across third-party reporting.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gumloop free?
Yes, Gumloop has a free plan with a monthly credit allowance (sources cite figures ranging from roughly 500 to 5,000 credits) and full access to the workflow builder. Paid plans start around $37/month for a higher credit allowance.
Why is Gumloop’s pricing confusing?
Gumloop bills in credits with a base cost per workflow run plus per-node costs — simple actions cost 1–3 credits, standard AI models about 2 credits, and advanced/expert AI models 20–30+ credits — and published plan names and prices vary noticeably across third-party sources, so it’s worth confirming current tiers directly with Gumloop.
What is Gumloop not good for?
Gumloop isn’t the best fit if you need the widest possible app-integration coverage (Zapier still covers more apps) or want flat, predictable per-task pricing rather than variable AI-credit costs.
What is Gumloop’s rating on G2 and Capterra?
As of 2026-08-07, Gumloop holds 4.8/5 on G2 (7 reviews) and 5.0/5 on Capterra, though the Capterra figure is based on just 2 reviews, so treat it as a weak signal. See the ratings table above for links to the live pages.
Similar tools in Automation & Workflows
Sources
- https://www.gumloop.com/pricing
- https://zapier.com/blog/gumloop-pricing/
- https://aiforbusinessautomation.com/tools/gumloop-review/
Compiled from public sources; last verified 2026-06-29. Pricing is subject to change — verify with the vendor. Ratings reflect editorial opinion.
Gumloop Review (4/5): Features, Pricing & Verdict (2026). DigiJaws, 2026. https://digijaws.com/reviews/gumloop-review/