Mentionova — Priced in agentic tasks rather than prompts — which makes it powerful, and makes it hard to compare.
Short answer: Mentionova sells agents that do marketing work rather than dashboards that report on it. Starter is $99 a month billed annually ($125 monthly) for 100 agentic tasks, 25 tracked prompts and monitoring across 3 AI engines. Scale is $320 annually ($400 monthly) for 500 tasks, 100 prompts, all 6 engines and Reddit engagement with drafted replies. Enterprise is $799 annually ($999 monthly) for 2,500 tasks and 250 prompts. Every plan includes a free trial, and the vendor states you keep final approval on agent output.
On this page
Verdict at a glance
Overall rating: 3.5/5 ★★★☆☆
Standout: ⭐ Human sign-off is built in, not bolted on. Mentionova states agents research, draft and compile around the clock and then hand over for one-click approval — you keep final say. For a category selling autonomy, designing the approval step in is the more defensible choice.
Watch out: ⚠️ Two meters, not one. You are buying both agentic tasks and tracked prompts, and they exhaust independently. Starter’s 100 tasks a month is roughly three a day — modest if agents are meant to replace the ~30 hours a week Mentionova says teams waste.
Mentionova rates 3.5 for a well-argued product with a pricing model that makes comparison genuinely hard. The premise is sound and specific: rather than reporting your AI visibility, it assigns agents to the work teams keep redoing — competitor research, LLM and Reddit monitoring, content briefs, report building — which the vendor quantifies at around 30 hours a week. Crucially it does not oversell the autonomy: agents research, draft and compile, then hand over for one-click sign-off, with the customer keeping final approval. That is the right design, and more honest than vendors promising unsupervised publishing. The difficulty is evaluating it. You are metered on agentic tasks and tracked prompts simultaneously, and a task is not defined precisely enough on the pricing page to forecast consumption. At $99 a month billed annually you get 100 tasks and 25 prompts — against MaxAEO’s 10 prompts at $15 or Otterly.ai‘s 15 at $29, the prompt allowance is fair, but you are paying mainly for the agents. Take the free trial and measure your own task burn before committing annually.
Quick facts
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Ideal user | Small growth teams wanting execution capacity, not another dashboard |
| Learning curve | ⚠️ Moderate — agents, workflows and grids to configure |
| Setup time | Hours to define workflows |
| Free trial | ⭐ Free trial on every plan |
| Free tier | ⚠️ None — trial only |
| Pricing | Starter $99/mo annual · $125 monthly |
| Metering | ⚠️ Two meters — agentic tasks and tracked prompts |
| Key limit | ⚠️ 100 tasks/mo on Starter, ~3 a day |
Overview
Mentionova positions itself as an agentic growth platform rather than an AI visibility tracker, and the distinction runs through the pricing. Its argument is that growth teams burn around 30 hours a week on work they keep redoing — roughly 8 hours on competitor and market research, 6 tracking LLMs and Reddit, 10 on content briefs and SEO, GEO and AEO work, and 4 building reports — and that agents should absorb it. The platform advertises more than 100 agents on call, monitoring across 6 answer engines, and a 24×7 cadence.
Plans are metered on two axes at once. Starter is $99 a month billed annually or $125 monthly, providing 100 agentic tasks a month, 25 tracked prompts, brand monitoring across 3 AI engines, pages and AI traffic attribution, actionable opportunities with ready briefs, Workflows and Grids for pipelines and bulk content, and integrations. Scale is $320 annually or $400 monthly for 500 tasks, 100 tracked prompts, monitoring across all 6 engines and Reddit engagement with drafted replies and a comment queue. Enterprise is $799 annually or $999 monthly for 2,500 tasks and 250 prompts. Annual billing saves roughly 20% across all three, and every tier offers a free trial. The company states it is trusted by 70-plus brands and agencies, and offers separate views for brands and for agencies.
The most important design decision is that Mentionova does not claim full autonomy. Its own description is that agents research, draft and compile around the clock and then hand over for a one-click sign-off, with the customer keeping final approval. In a category where several vendors sell unsupervised publishing into your CMS, building the approval step into the product is both more defensible and more honest — and it means the practical constraint on output is your review capacity as much as your task allowance.
Key features
- 100+ agents — research, monitoring, briefs and reporting
- One-click sign-off — ⭐ human approval retained by design
- 6 answer engines — all six on Scale, 3 on Starter
- Tracked prompts — 25, 100 or 250 by tier
- Reddit engagement — ⭐ drafted replies and comment queue, Scale and above
- Pages and AI traffic attribution — on every plan
- Workflows and Grids — pipelines and bulk content production
- Ready content briefs — opportunities surfaced with briefs attached
- Free trial — ⭐ on every plan
- Agency view — separate packaging for agencies
Pricing (as of 2026-10-01)
Model: dual-metered subscriptions — agentic tasks and tracked prompts; ~20% off annual billing · Free tier: ⚠️ none, but every plan includes a free trial · Entry paid: $99/mo annual (Starter)
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $99/mo billed annually · $125 monthly | 100 agentic tasks a month · 25 tracked prompts · brand monitoring across 3 AI engines · pages and AI traffic attribution · actionable opportunities with ready briefs · Workflows and Grids · integrations |
| Scale | $320/mo billed annually · $400 monthly | 500 agentic tasks a month · 100 tracked prompts · ⭐ monitoring across all 6 AI engines · Reddit engagement with drafted replies and comment queue · everything in Starter |
| Enterprise | $799/mo billed annually · $999 monthly | 2,500 agentic tasks a month · 250 tracked prompts · everything in Scale |
⚠️ You are metered twice, on agentic tasks and on tracked prompts, and they exhaust independently. Mentionova does not define precisely what consumes one task, which makes forecasting hard — the free trial is the only reliable way to measure your own burn rate before committing to annual billing.
⚠️ Starter monitors 3 AI engines; all 6 require Scale at $320 a month billed annually. That is a large step for engine coverage alone, so establish which three Starter includes and whether they are the engines your buyers use.
⭐ Human approval is designed in rather than optional. Mentionova states agents research, draft and compile continuously and then hand over for one-click sign-off, with the customer keeping final approval — a more defensible position than competitors selling unsupervised publishing, and one that makes your own review capacity a real constraint on throughput.
⚠️ Judged purely as a visibility tracker, the prompt allowances are unremarkable: 25 prompts at $99 a month against MaxAEO’s 10 at $15 and Otterly.ai‘s 15 at $29. You are paying for the agentic execution layer, so only choose Mentionova if you will actually use it.
⭐ Annual billing saves roughly 20% on every tier — $99 against $125, $320 against $400, and $799 against $999 — and a free trial is offered on all three, which makes the sensible path a trial followed by annual commitment rather than a monthly hedge.
Ratings breakdown
| Criterion | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ease Of Use | 3.5/5 | ⚠️ Workflows and dual metering take setting up |
| Features | 4.0/5 | ⭐ Execution agents plus monitoring, with approval built in |
| Value | 3.5/5 | ⚠️ Hard to compare — you buy tasks, not just prompts |
| Support | 3.5/5 | Standard; agency packaging available |
Pros
- ⭐ Human one-click sign-off retained by design rather than optional
- ⭐ Reddit engagement with drafted replies from the Scale tier
- Agents cover research, monitoring, briefs and reporting, not just measurement
- Free trial on every plan
- Annual billing saves roughly 20% across all tiers
- Pages and AI traffic attribution included from Starter
- Separate packaging for agencies as well as brands
- Named customer testimonials with specific figures and job titles
Cons
- ⚠️ Dual metering on tasks and prompts makes cost forecasting difficult
- ⚠️ An agentic task is not precisely defined on the pricing page
- ⚠️ Only 3 of 6 AI engines on Starter
- ⚠️ 100 tasks a month on Starter is roughly three a day
- Prompt allowances are unremarkable against cheaper trackers
- Throughput is bounded by your own review capacity, not just the plan
- Customer results quoted are vendor-published and unaudited
Who it’s for
- Small growth teams whose bottleneck is execution capacity, not information
- Marketers who want briefs and drafts produced, then approved by a human
- Brands where Reddit visibility and engagement genuinely matter
- Agencies wanting agent-driven throughput across client accounts
Who it’s not for
- Buyers who only need AI visibility monitoring — it costs far less elsewhere
- Teams without capacity to review what the agents produce
- Anyone needing all six engines at the entry price
- Organisations that require precise cost forecasting before committing
Best use cases
- Automating competitor and market research on a continuous cadence
- Producing content briefs against surfaced AI visibility opportunities
- Drafting Reddit replies for human approval on the Scale tier
- Compiling recurring reports without analyst time
- Running bulk content pipelines through Workflows and Grids
Integrations
Mentionova lists integrations as included from the Starter tier upward, and pages and AI traffic attribution sit alongside them, which implies analytics connections at minimum — but the pricing page does not enumerate connectors, publish API documentation or mention an MCP server. For a platform whose value proposition is agents doing work across your stack, that is a gap worth closing in a sales conversation: agents that research and draft are only as useful as their ability to reach the systems where the work lands. The Reddit engagement feature on Scale is the most concretely specified integration, providing drafted replies and a comment queue rather than merely monitoring — a genuinely unusual capability, and one of the few places in this category where a tool acts on a third-party platform rather than just observing it.
How it compares
| Mentionova | Gumshoe | MaxAEO | Otterly.ai | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $99/mo annual (Starter) | $99/mo (Starter) | ⭐ $15/mo annual (Starter) | $29/mo (Lite) |
| Working tier | $320/mo Scale annual | $299/mo Pro | $119/mo Growth annual | $189/mo Standard |
| Monitoring cadence | ⭐ 24×7 cadence | Weekly on Starter, daily on Pro | ⭐ Daily monitoring | ⭐ Daily on every plan |
| AI engines | 3 on Starter, 6 on Scale | ⭐ 11 tracked, 6 per audit | 4 of 8 below Enterprise | 4 answer engines |
| Free entry | ⭐ Free trial | ⭐ Free sample audit | Self-serve signup | ⚠️ No free plan |
| Best fit | Agentic task automation for growth teams | Persona-based AI visibility measurement | Cheapest published AI visibility monitoring | Cheapest credible daily AI visibility tracking |
All figures are vendor-published and verified on 2026-09-07. Entry prices are the cheapest published rate, annual where the vendor offers one.
Alternatives
If you want measurement rather than execution, everything here is cheaper: MaxAEO tracks 10 prompts daily at $15 a month billed annually, Otterly.ai 15 prompts across four answer engines at $29, and SE Ranking 100 prompts daily inside a full SEO suite at $103.20. Gumshoe is the closer intellectual match at $99, offering persona-level analysis across 11 models plus a content generator — measurement and execution, like Mentionova, but weighted toward diagnosis. Quattr and Relixir push further into execution but publish no pricing at all, which makes Mentionova notably more transparent than its closest functional peers. And daydream is the alternative if what you actually want is people rather than agents. Mentionova’s distinctive assets are Reddit engagement and the designed-in approval step.
Recent changes
As verified on 2026-09-07, Mentionova publishes three tiers with roughly 20% off annual billing and a free trial on each. Starter is $99 a month billed annually or $125 monthly, covering 100 agentic tasks a month, 25 tracked prompts, brand monitoring across 3 AI engines, pages and AI traffic attribution, actionable opportunities with ready briefs, Workflows and Grids, and integrations. Scale is $320 annually or $400 monthly for 500 agentic tasks, 100 tracked prompts, monitoring across all 6 AI engines, and Reddit engagement with drafted replies and a comment queue. Enterprise is $799 annually or $999 monthly for 2,500 agentic tasks and 250 tracked prompts. The platform advertises more than 100 agents on call, 6 answer engines, a 24×7 cadence and around 30 hours saved a week, and states it is trusted by 70-plus brands and agencies. Mentionova continues to state that agents research, draft and compile around the clock before handing over for one-click sign-off, with the customer retaining final approval.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Mentionova cost?
Starter is $99 a month billed annually, or $125 billed monthly. Scale is $320 annually or $400 monthly. Enterprise is $799 annually or $999 monthly. Annual billing saves roughly 20% on each, and every plan includes a free trial. Note that you are buying two metered resources — agentic tasks and tracked prompts — not just prompt tracking.
What is an agentic task?
This is the key question and Mentionova’s pricing page does not define it precisely. Plans include 100, 500 or 2,500 agentic tasks a month, consumed when agents perform work such as competitor research, monitoring, drafting briefs or compiling reports. Because the unit is not specified, the free trial is the only reliable way to measure your own consumption before committing to an annual plan — do that before deciding between Starter and Scale.
How many AI engines does Mentionova monitor?
Starter covers 3 AI engines; all 6 require the Scale plan at $320 a month billed annually. The platform advertises 6 answer engines overall with a 24×7 cadence. Since engine coverage is one of the main reasons to buy a visibility tool at all, confirm which three Starter includes before subscribing — a $221 monthly step up for engine coverage is significant.
Do Mentionova’s agents publish without my approval?
No, and the company is explicit about this. It states that agents research, draft and compile around the clock and then hand over for a one-click sign-off, with you keeping final approval. That is a more defensible design than competitors offering unsupervised publishing into your CMS, though it does mean your own review capacity becomes a practical limit on how much the agents can deliver.
Is Mentionova good value against cheaper AI visibility tools?
Only if you use the agents. Judged purely on prompt tracking, 25 prompts at $99 a month compares poorly with MaxAEO’s 10 at $15 or Otterly.ai‘s 15 at $29 — and SE Ranking tracks 100 daily for $103.20 inside a full SEO suite. The agentic execution layer is what you are paying for, so the honest test is whether your team will genuinely hand over the research, briefing and reporting work.
What is the Reddit engagement feature?
Available from the Scale tier, it provides drafted replies and a comment queue rather than monitoring alone — the agents write responses and you approve them. This is unusual in the category, where most tools observe third-party platforms without acting on them, and it matters because Reddit is one of the sources AI models cite heavily. Treat it as a genuine differentiator, and apply the same governance care you would to any automated posting in your brand’s name.
Does Mentionova offer a free trial?
Yes, on every plan, and given the dual-metering model it is effectively essential rather than optional — it is the only way to learn what your monthly agentic task consumption actually looks like before choosing a tier. That puts Mentionova ahead of quote-only competitors such as Quattr and Relixir, which sell similar execution-focused capability without publishing any pricing at all.
Sources
- Mentionova — official pricing page and plan comparison
- Gumshoe — official pricing and capability comparison
- MaxAEO — official pricing page
- SE Ranking — official pricing page
- XFunnel — official pricing page
Compiled from public sources; last verified 2026-10-01. Pricing is subject to change — verify with the vendor. Ratings reflect editorial opinion based on documented capabilities, published pricing, and aggregated user reviews. DigiJaws does not accept payment for review placement or rating.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@graph”: [{“@type”: “Review”, “itemReviewed”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “Mentionova”, “applicationCategory”: “Agentic Growth & AI Visibility Platform”, “operatingSystem”: “Web”, “url”: “https://mentionova.com”, “offers”: {“@type”: “Offer”, “price”: “99.00”, “priceCurrency”: “USD”}}, “author”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “DigiJaws”, “url”: “https://digijaws.com”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “DigiJaws”, “url”: “https://digijaws.com”}, “reviewRating”: {“@type”: “Rating”, “ratingValue”: “3.5”, “bestRating”: “5”, “worstRating”: “1”}, “name”: “Mentionova Review 2026: Pricing & Verdict”, “reviewBody”: “Mentionova sells agents that do marketing work rather than dashboards that report on it. Starter is $99 a month billed annually ($125 monthly) for 100 agentic tasks, 25 tracked prompts and monitoring across 3 AI engines. Scale is $320 annually ($400 monthly) for 500 tasks, 100 prompts, all 6 engines and Reddit engagement with drafted replies. Enterprise is $799 annually ($999 monthly) for 2,500 tasks and 250 prompts. Every plan includes a free trial, and the vendor states you keep final approval on agent output.”, “datePublished”: “2026-10-05”, “dateModified”: “2026-10-05”, “url”: “https://digijaws.com/reviews/mentionova-review/”}, {“@type”: “FAQPage”, “mainEntity”: [{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How much does Mentionova cost?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Starter is $99 a month billed annually, or $125 billed monthly. Scale is $320 annually or $400 monthly. Enterprise is $799 annually or $999 monthly. Annual billing saves roughly 20% on each, and every plan includes a free trial. Note that you are buying two metered resources — agentic tasks and tracked prompts — not just prompt tracking.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What is an agentic task?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “This is the key question and Mentionova’s pricing page does not define it precisely. Plans include 100, 500 or 2,500 agentic tasks a month, consumed when agents perform work such as competitor research, monitoring, drafting briefs or compiling reports. Because the unit is not specified, the free trial is the only reliable way to measure your own consumption before committing to an annual plan — do that before deciding between Starter and Scale.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How many AI engines does Mentionova monitor?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Starter covers 3 AI engines; all 6 require the Scale plan at $320 a month billed annually. The platform advertises 6 answer engines overall with a 24×7 cadence. Since engine coverage is one of the main reasons to buy a visibility tool at all, confirm which three Starter includes before subscribing — a $221 monthly step up for engine coverage is significant.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Do Mentionova’s agents publish without my approval?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “No, and the company is explicit about this. It states that agents research, draft and compile around the clock and then hand over for a one-click sign-off, with you keeping final approval. That is a more defensible design than competitors offering unsupervised publishing into your CMS, though it does mean your own review capacity becomes a practical limit on how much the agents can deliver.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Is Mentionova good value against cheaper AI visibility tools?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Only if you use the agents. Judged purely on prompt tracking, 25 prompts at $99 a month compares poorly with MaxAEO’s 10 at $15 or Otterly.ai’s 15 at $29 — and SE Ranking tracks 100 daily for $103.20 inside a full SEO suite. The agentic execution layer is what you are paying for, so the honest test is whether your team will genuinely hand over the research, briefing and reporting work.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What is the Reddit engagement feature?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Available from the Scale tier, it provides drafted replies and a comment queue rather than monitoring alone — the agents write responses and you approve them. This is unusual in the category, where most tools observe third-party platforms without acting on them, and it matters because Reddit is one of the sources AI models cite heavily. Treat it as a genuine differentiator, and apply the same governance care you would to any automated posting in your brand’s name.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Does Mentionova offer a free trial?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Yes, on every plan, and given the dual-metering model it is effectively essential rather than optional — it is the only way to learn what your monthly agentic task consumption actually looks like before choosing a tier. That puts Mentionova ahead of quote-only competitors such as Quattr and Relixir, which sell similar execution-focused capability without publishing any pricing at all.”}}]}]}
Mentionova Review 2026: Pricing & Verdict. DigiJaws, 2026. https://digijaws.com/reviews/mentionova-review/