Am I on AI — Audience-segment tracking done well — but only two answer engines, at prices where rivals give you eight.
Short answer: Am I on AI tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews only, with persona-based discovery and audience-segment analysis as its differentiator. Pro is $100/month for 150 prompts; Prism is $349/month for 750 prompts across five audience segments. GEO Council at $2,500/month is a consulting retainer and is currently waitlisted.
On this page
Verdict at a glance
Audience-segment tracking — up to five personas with separate citations and action plans each, which no direct competitor structures this way.
Two answer engines at every price point. At $349, rivals such as LLMrefs give eight engines and 500 prompts for $79.
Am I on AI has one genuinely good idea and one serious problem. The good idea is persona segmentation: rather than tracking a flat prompt list, Prism splits visibility across up to five audience segments, each with its own citations and action plan. For a brand selling to distinct buyer types, that is a more useful shape of answer than a single aggregate score, and nobody else structures it this way. The problem is coverage. The platform tracks ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews — two engines — at every tier including the $349 Prism plan. Competitors at a fifth of that price cover eight. If your buyers genuinely only use ChatGPT, the segmentation may justify the premium; if they use Perplexity, Gemini, Claude or Copilot, you are paying substantially more for substantially less visibility. The $2,500 GEO Council is a consulting retainer rather than software, and is currently fully booked.
Quick facts
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Ideal team | Brands with distinct buyer personas whose audience is concentrated on ChatGPT |
| Learning curve | Low to moderate — segment setup requires thinking about personas first |
| Setup time | Minutes on Pro; segment definition takes longer on Prism |
| Free trial | 7 days on Pro and Prism, no commitment |
| Free tier | None |
| AI engines | Two — ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews |
| Prompts | 150 on Pro, 750 across five segments on Prism |
| Key limit | Only two engines, unchanged at any price |
Overview
Am I on AI is built around a question most competitors flatten: not just whether AI assistants mention you, but whether they mention you to the right people. The Prism plan at $349/month splits tracking across up to five audience segments, giving each its own citations, its own action plan and its own persona-based discovery insights. A brand selling to both procurement managers and end users can see that it dominates one conversation and is absent from the other — a distinction a single aggregate visibility score hides entirely. That framing is the platform’s real contribution.
Pro at $100/month is the simpler product: 150 prompts scanned, full access to citation data, personalised recommendations and content pillar tracking, without segmentation. Both tiers carry a 7-day free trial with no commitment. Above them sits GEO Council at $2,500/month, which is not really software — it bundles custom segments and prompts with expert consultation, monthly strategy calls and a quarterly board reporting snapshot. It is a consulting retainer with a tool attached, and it is currently fully booked with a waitlist.
The coverage limitation is the thing to weigh hardest, and it does not improve as you spend more. Every tier tracks ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews and nothing else. Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI are absent. For context, LLMrefs covers eight engines and 500 prompts for $79, and Trakkr covers eight for $100. That gap means Am I on AI is only defensible if your buyers really are concentrated on ChatGPT, or if the segmentation is worth more to you than seeing the rest of the answer-engine landscape. Establish which is true during the trial before committing to Prism.
Key features
- Audience-segment trackingup to five separate segments on Prism, each with its own analysis
- Persona-based discovery insightshow visibility differs by buyer type rather than in aggregate
- Per-segment citations and action plansseparate remediation guidance for each audience
- LLM brand visibility scorea single headline metric across tracked prompts
- Full citation and source datawhich pages feed the answers you appear in
- Content pillar trackingvisibility grouped by content theme rather than only by prompt
- Competitor benchmarkingrelative position against named rivals
- Personalised recommendationsaction plans rather than raw data
- GEO Councilexpert consultation, monthly strategy calls and quarterly board reporting at the top tier
Pricing (as of 2026-09-05)
Model: prompt- and segment-limited monthly subscription; top tier is a consulting retainer · Free tier: no — 7-day free trial on Pro and Prism · Entry paid: Pro $100/mo
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | $100/mo | Scans up to 150 prompts · ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews · full access to citation data · personalised recommendations · content pillar tracking · 7-day free trial |
| Prism | $349/mo | Up to 750 total prompts · 5 separate audience segments · ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews · full citations and an action plan per segment · persona-based discovery insights · 7-day free trial |
| GEO Council | $2,500/mo | Custom segments and prompts · expert consultation and action plan · monthly strategy calls · quarterly board reporting snapshot — currently fully booked, waitlist available |
GEO Council is a consulting engagement rather than a software tier, and is currently waitlisted. Judge the platform on Pro and Prism.
⚠️ Engine coverage does not increase with price: every tier tracks ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews only. At $349, LLMrefs offers eight engines and 500 prompts for $79 and Trakkr offers eight for $100. Only choose this if audience segmentation is worth more to you than seeing the rest of the answer-engine landscape. Pricing moves quickly; verify with the vendor.
Ratings breakdown
Pros
- Audience-segment tracking with up to five personas, structured better than any direct rival
- Separate citations and action plans per segment rather than one aggregate view
- Content pillar tracking groups visibility by theme, not just by prompt
- Clear, opinionated product that answers a specific question well
- 7-day free trial on both software tiers with no commitment
- GEO Council offers genuine strategic consultation for buyers who want it
Cons
- Only two AI engines — ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews — at every price point
- $349 Prism is poor value on coverage against $79 rivals offering eight engines
- No Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek or Meta AI coverage at all
- GEO Council at $2,500 is consulting rather than software, and is currently waitlisted
- No free tier
- Thin independent review base compared with established competitors
Who it’s for
- Brands whose buyers are genuinely concentrated on ChatGPT
- Companies selling to several distinct personas who need visibility split by audience
- Teams who want a per-segment action plan rather than an aggregate score
- Buyers who value strategic consultation alongside the tooling
Who it’s not for
- Anyone needing coverage of Perplexity, Gemini, Claude or Copilot
- Budget-conscious teams — the coverage per dollar is the weakest we have reviewed
- Agencies managing many client brands
- Organisations needing crawler-level diagnostics or content generation
Best use cases
- Comparing AI visibility across distinct buyer personas
- Building a separate remediation plan for each audience segment
- Tracking visibility grouped by content pillar rather than individual prompt
- Reporting AI visibility to a board via the GEO Council quarterly snapshot
- Benchmarking ChatGPT-specific presence against named competitors
Integrations
Am I on AI does not publish an integrations list, and no API access is documented on the Pro or Prism tiers. GEO Council includes expert consultation, monthly strategy calls and a quarterly board reporting snapshot delivered as a service rather than through connectors. Confirm export and integration options directly if they matter to your workflow.
How it compares
| Am I on AI | LLMrefs | Trakkr | Superlines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $100/mo | $79/mo | $100/mo | €79/mo |
| AI engines | 2 | 8 | 8 | 3 (of 10+) |
| Prompts at entry | 150 | 500 | 50 per brand | 50 |
| Working tier price | $349 (Prism) | $79 | $100 | €199 (Pro) |
| Engines at working tier | 2 | 8 | 8 | 3 |
| Audience segments | Yes, up to 5 | No | No | No |
| Best fit | Persona-split visibility | Prompt volume | Tracking + content | Agencies |
Prices verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-09-05 and shown in each vendor’s own currency. The engine-coverage gap is the decisive comparison here: Am I on AI is alone in not increasing coverage as price rises.
Alternatives
LLMrefs is the sharpest contrast — 500 prompts across eight engines for $79 against Prism’s 750 across two for $349 — though it offers no segmentation. Trakkr covers eight engines for $100 and adds content production. Superlines offers persona-adjacent structure through its Action Center with a dedicated agency line. If audience segmentation is genuinely the requirement, Profound Enterprise and Athena HQ Enterprise both offer persona targeting alongside far wider engine coverage. See our roundup of the 25 best AI visibility tools for the full landscape.
Disclosure: DigiJaws publishes this review and sells a competing product: a free AI visibility checker that audits how machine-readable a page is, and the Prompt Observatory at $49 a month, which re-queries AI engines weekly and records which brands they name. We have deliberately left both out of the ratings and comparisons here rather than rate our own work.
Recent changes
Am I on AI has restructured around audience segmentation, with the Prism tier at $349/month now tracking up to 750 prompts across five separate segments, each with its own citations and action plan. Pro remains the simpler entry at $100/month for 150 prompts with content pillar tracking. A consulting tier, GEO Council, has been introduced at $2,500/month covering custom segments, expert consultation, monthly strategy calls and a quarterly board reporting snapshot; it is currently fully booked with a waitlist. Engine coverage has not expanded alongside the tiering and remains limited to ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews across all plans, which is the platform’s most significant competitive gap.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Am I on AI cost?
Pro is $100/month for 150 prompts, Prism is $349/month for 750 prompts across five audience segments, and GEO Council is $2,500/month for custom segments plus consultation. Pro and Prism include a 7-day free trial with no commitment. GEO Council is currently fully booked with a waitlist.
Which AI platforms does Am I on AI track?
Two: ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews. That does not change with price — the $349 Prism plan covers the same two engines as the $100 Pro plan. Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI are not covered.
Is Am I on AI worth $349 a month?
Only if audience segmentation is the specific thing you need and your buyers are concentrated on ChatGPT. On coverage per dollar it is the weakest option we have reviewed — LLMrefs gives eight engines and 500 prompts for $79. The segmentation is genuinely good, but you are paying a large premium for it while losing six engines.
What are audience segments in Am I on AI?
Prism splits your visibility tracking across up to five distinct buyer personas, giving each its own citations, action plan and discovery insights. Rather than one aggregate visibility score, you see that you dominate the conversation for one buyer type and are invisible to another. No direct competitor structures the analysis this way.
What is the GEO Council plan?
A $2,500/month consulting retainer rather than a software tier. It covers custom segments and prompts, expert consultation and action planning, monthly strategy calls and a quarterly board reporting snapshot. It is currently fully booked with a waitlist, so judge the platform on Pro and Prism.
Does Am I on AI have a free plan?
No free tier. Pro and Prism both include a 7-day free trial with no commitment, which is the right way to establish whether two-engine coverage is sufficient for your audience before committing to Prism at $349.
How does Am I on AI compare to LLMrefs?
They sit at opposite ends of the value spectrum. LLMrefs covers eight engines, 500 prompts, unlimited projects and unlimited seats for $79/month. Am I on AI covers two engines and 750 prompts for $349, adding audience segmentation LLMrefs does not offer. Unless persona-split reporting is a hard requirement, LLMrefs delivers far more coverage for far less.
Sources
- Am I on AI — official pricing page
- GoodFirms — AmIOnAI reviews and pricing 2026
- Authoritas — AI tracker comparison
- Ekamoira — Best AI brand visibility tools 2026, 27+ platforms compared
- Alhena — 7 best AI brand visibility tracking tools in 2026
Compiled from public sources; last verified 2026-09-05. Pricing is subject to change — verify with the vendor. Ratings reflect editorial opinion based on documented capabilities, published pricing, and aggregated user reviews. DigiJaws does not accept payment for review placement or rating.
Looking for the numbers? Our Am I on AI pricing page breaks down every plan, what each upgrade costs over a year, and what the headline price leaves out.
Am I on AI Review (3/5): Features & Verdict (2026). DigiJaws, 2026. https://digijaws.com/reviews/am-i-on-ai-review/